RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04834 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect her grade of staff sergeant (E-5) (SSgt). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was demoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4) (SrA) as a result of failed Fitness Assessments. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) returned her grade of SSgt, after they found she served satisfactorily in the higher grade. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of the SAFPC Grade Determination, her DD Forms 214, and her Request and Authorization for Separation. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who was progressively promoted to the grade of SSgt. The applicant was demoted to SrA on 14 January 2013. Her package was forwarded to SAFPC for finalization of her Medical Board and grade determination. On 10 April 2013, SAFPC found the applicant unfit and directed she be discharged with severance pay. They also determined that she did serve satisfactorily in the higher grade of SSgt within the meaning of Title 10, Untied States Code, Section 1212; and, that she was entitled to disability severance pay in the grade of SSgt. She was released from active duty on 14 July 2013 and honorably discharged with severance pay, with a disability rating of 20 percent. She completed 14 years, 6 months, and 15 days on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial. DPFD states the applicant’s DD Form 214 correctly reflects the grade of SrA which was the active duty grade she was wearing upon her date of separation. To amend or change her DD Form 214 would be in violation of Air Force Instructions and is not authorized. The complete DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 May 2014, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04834 in Executive Session on 12 June 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Oct 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPFD, dated 9 Dec 13. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 14. Panel Chair 2 3